Non fiction post

In the article "is football is just to dangerous" there is an debate showing each side of what people think about football, Being just to dangerous or not as dangerous as others can make it seem. The author I believe wants to show the reader how people can have a different opinion on one thing. Some People would say yes some people would say no. In this case the topic is football. This arictle to me makes me feel like author wants to prove a point but he used people's opinion to say its, cause everyone's opinion is different not the same. The author was smart by doing this because he made people sit down and really consider what he was trying to ask; is football just too dangerous. He also used stats to show reasons why people would say it is dangerous and then he used reasons why people can compare other sports and think differently. I felt like that was a great tool to use cause then people could have at least one reason to back up what they think about the topic. In my opinion this was a great article to read! I learned new things like the brain dissorders football can leave you. I also learned how girls hockey has the most conclusion rate of any sport. Which is hard to believe but true. Hockey is also very dangerous to, people comapare that to football and say maybe football isn't as bad as people say. Then the others that feel football is too dangerous and look at the brain dissorders you can get from football and say that football is the most dangerous sport we have today.